How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Iceland

1.64 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

1.5 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland rank

64th

Sudan rank

66th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Iceland
Sudan

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.5 million SLC per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.14 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 66th of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	1.15 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0902 million SLC per square kilometre	1.06 million SLC per square kilometre	Iceland
2020s	1.51 million SLC per square kilometre	1.16 million SLC per square kilometre	0.3478 million SLC per square kilometre	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Iceland or Sudan?: Iceland, at 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.5 million SLC per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Iceland and Sudan?: 0.14 million SLC per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Iceland ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 66th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/iceland/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/iceland/sudan/">Iceland vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit: million SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.