Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Jamaica
24.95 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
25.49 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
23rd
Pakistan rank
22nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Jamaica
  • Pakistan
0102030197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 25.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 24.95 million SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.54 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Pakistan ahead.

Jamaica ranks 23rd and Pakistan ranks 22nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0187 million SLC per square kilometre 0.06 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0413 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 0.085 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2173 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1322 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 1.38 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8401 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5412 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 3.33 million SLC per square kilometre 2.47 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8603 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 9.35 million SLC per square kilometre 8.55 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8001 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 19.34 million SLC per square kilometre 18.68 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6646 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Jamaica or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 25.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 24.95 million SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Jamaica and Pakistan?
0.54 million SLC per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Pakistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Jamaica ranks 23rd and Pakistan ranks 22nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/jamaica/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/jamaica/pakistan/">Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.