Jordan vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Jordan
0.0195 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
164th
Zambia rank
161st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Jordan
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0195 million SLC per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.0032 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 161st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0018 million SLC per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0119 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0154 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.018 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0194 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Jordan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0195 million SLC per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Jordan and Zambia?
0.0032 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Jordan ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 161st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/jordan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/jordan/zambia/">Jordan vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.