Latvia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Latvia
0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
160th
Namibia rank
162nd
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0053 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0137 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0126 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0236 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.021 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Latvia and Namibia?
- 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Latvia ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.