Latvia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Latvia
0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
160th
Namibia rank
162nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Latvia
  • Namibia
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0053 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0137 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0126 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0236 million SLC per square kilometre 0.021 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Latvia or Namibia?
Latvia, at 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Latvia and Namibia?
0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Latvia ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/latvia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/latvia/namibia/">Latvia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.