How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Latvia

0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Panama

0.0274 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

160th

Panama rank

158th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Latvia
Panama

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0274 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0033 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Panama ahead.

Latvia ranks 160th and Panama ranks 158th of 180 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Panama	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0085 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0043 million SLC per square kilometre	Panama
2000s	0.008 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0128 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0048 million SLC per square kilometre	Panama
2010s	0.0137 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0196 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre	Panama
2020s	0.0236 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0253 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre	Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Latvia or Panama?: Panama, at 0.0274 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Latvia and Panama?: 0.0033 million SLC per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Latvia ranks 160th and Panama ranks 158th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/latvia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/latvia/panama/">Latvia vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit: million SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.