Latvia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Latvia
0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
160th
Zambia rank
161st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Latvia
  • Zambia
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 160th and Zambia ranks 161st of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0137 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0154 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0236 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0194 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0043 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Latvia or Zambia?
Latvia, at 0.0241 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Latvia and Zambia?
0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Latvia ranks 160th and Zambia ranks 161st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/latvia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/latvia/zambia/">Latvia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.