Malawi vs Paraguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Malawi
40.53 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
89.22 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
15th
Paraguay rank
12th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Malawi
  • Paraguay
020406080197019962023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 89.22 million SLC per square kilometre against 40.53 million SLC per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 48.69 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 2.2 times Malawi's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 15th and Paraguay ranks 12th of 180 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Paraguay Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1051 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0987 million SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
1980s 0.0175 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7908 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7733 million SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
1990s 0.1833 million SLC per square kilometre 5.82 million SLC per square kilometre 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
2000s 1.57 million SLC per square kilometre 19.53 million SLC per square kilometre 17.96 million SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 10.31 million SLC per square kilometre 50.73 million SLC per square kilometre 40.42 million SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 31.43 million SLC per square kilometre 77.86 million SLC per square kilometre 46.44 million SLC per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Malawi or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 89.22 million SLC per square kilometre against 40.53 million SLC per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Malawi and Paraguay?
48.69 million SLC per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Paraguay?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Paraguay rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Malawi ranks 15th and Paraguay ranks 12th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Paraguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/malawi/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/malawi/paraguay/">Malawi vs Paraguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.