Mauritania vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mauritania
0.0707 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.075 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
135th
Spain rank
132nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mauritania
  • Spain
00.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0.075 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0707 million SLC per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0043 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Spain ahead.

Mauritania ranks 135th and Spain ranks 132nd of 180 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Spain Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.007 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.0043 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0197 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0155 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.0084 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0378 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0294 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.0157 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0516 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0359 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2010s 0.0412 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0575 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0163 million SLC per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.0656 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0675 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0019 million SLC per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mauritania or Spain?
Spain, at 0.075 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0707 million SLC per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mauritania and Spain?
0.0043 million SLC per square kilometre, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Spain?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Spain rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mauritania ranks 135th and Spain ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/mauritania/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/mauritania/spain/">Mauritania vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.