Mauritius vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mauritius
12.53 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
7.91 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
35th
Nepal rank
38th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mauritius
  • Nepal
02.557.51012.5197019962023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 12.53 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.91 million SLC per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 4.62 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.6 times Nepal's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 35th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.392 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0706 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3214 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1.06 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1788 million SLC per square kilometre 0.877 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2.78 million SLC per square kilometre 0.618 million SLC per square kilometre 2.16 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 4.69 million SLC per square kilometre 1.42 million SLC per square kilometre 3.28 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 6.46 million SLC per square kilometre 4.34 million SLC per square kilometre 2.13 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 9.41 million SLC per square kilometre 6.97 million SLC per square kilometre 2.44 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mauritius or Nepal?
Mauritius, at 12.53 million SLC per square kilometre against 7.91 million SLC per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mauritius and Nepal?
4.62 million SLC per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nepal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Nepal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mauritius ranks 35th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/mauritius/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/mauritius/nepal/">Mauritius vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.