Myanmar vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Myanmar
42.61 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
58.49 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
14th
Nigeria rank
13th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Myanmar
  • Nigeria
0204060197019962023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 58.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 42.61 million SLC per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 15.88 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.4 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 14th and Nigeria ranks 13th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Nigeria Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0152 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0095 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 0.0489 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0429 million SLC per square kilometre 0.006 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 0.709 million SLC per square kilometre 0.768 million SLC per square kilometre 0.059 million SLC per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 9.61 million SLC per square kilometre 6.71 million SLC per square kilometre 2.9 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 28.53 million SLC per square kilometre 22.19 million SLC per square kilometre 6.34 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 40.49 million SLC per square kilometre 49.29 million SLC per square kilometre 8.8 million SLC per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Myanmar or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 58.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 42.61 million SLC per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Myanmar and Nigeria?
15.88 million SLC per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Nigeria?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Nigeria rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Myanmar ranks 14th and Nigeria ranks 13th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/myanmar/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/myanmar/nigeria/">Myanmar vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.