Namibia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Namibia
0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
162nd
Zambia rank
161st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Namibia
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 161st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0008 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0053 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0126 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0154 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0028 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.021 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0194 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0016 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Namibia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0227 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Namibia and Zambia?
0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Namibia ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 161st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/namibia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/namibia/zambia/">Namibia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.