Qatar vs Romania: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Qatar
0.1976 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.2704 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
106th
Romania rank
103rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Qatar
  • Romania
00.10.20.3197019962023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.2704 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1976 million SLC per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0.0728 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.4 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 106th and Romania ranks 103rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Romania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0057 million SLC per square kilometre Qatar
1980s 0.0176 million SLC per square kilometre 0 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0176 million SLC per square kilometre Qatar
1990s 0.023 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0094 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0136 million SLC per square kilometre Qatar
2000s 0.0245 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1029 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0784 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0841 million SLC per square kilometre 0.152 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0678 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.1785 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2321 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0536 million SLC per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Qatar or Romania?
Romania, at 0.2704 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1976 million SLC per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Qatar and Romania?
0.0728 million SLC per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Romania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Romania rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Qatar ranks 106th and Romania ranks 103rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Romania: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/qatar/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/qatar/romania/">Qatar vs Romania: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.