South Africa vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

South Africa
0.1452 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.1514 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
114th
Sweden rank
111th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • South Africa
  • Sweden
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.1514 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1452 million SLC per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.0062 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

South Africa ranks 114th and Sweden ranks 111th of 180 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0015 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0529 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0514 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0056 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1094 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1038 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0163 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1199 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1036 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0371 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1051 million SLC per square kilometre 0.068 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0772 million SLC per square kilometre 0.133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0557 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.1373 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1497 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0124 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, South Africa or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.1514 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1452 million SLC per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between South Africa and Sweden?
0.0062 million SLC per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Sweden rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
South Africa ranks 114th and Sweden ranks 111th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/south-africa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-square/south-africa/sweden/">South Africa vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.