How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Gabon?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Gabon: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Chile

0 million SLC per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Gabon

0 million SLC per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

34th

Gabon rank

35th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Chile
Gabon

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Gabon, a difference of 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gabon ahead.

Chile ranks 34th and Gabon ranks 35th of 179 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Gabon	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	Gabon
1980s	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	Gabon
1990s	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	Gabon
2000s	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	Gabon
2010s	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	Gabon
2020s	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	0 million SLC per US$ of GDP	Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Chile or Gabon?: Chile, at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Gabon as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Chile and Gabon?: 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Gabon?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and Gabon rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Chile ranks 34th and Gabon ranks 35th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Gabon: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/gabon/">Chile vs Gabon: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP
Unit: million SLC per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 179 places, 8,833 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.