Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mauritius
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius rank
81st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
78th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0000197019972024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Mauritius, a difference of 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 81st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 78th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1980s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1990s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2000s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP against 0 million SLC per US$ of GDP in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 million SLC per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mauritius ranks 81st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 78th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, per unit of GDP
Unit
million SLC per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 8,833 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.