China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

China, Hong Kong SAR
1,465 million SLC
in 2024
Jordan
1,906 million SLC
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
153rd
Jordan rank
150th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Jordan
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019972024

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1,906 million SLC against 1,465 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 441 million SLC.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 153rd and Jordan ranks 150th of 199 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Jordan Difference Ahead
1970s 474.85 million SLC 33.49 million SLC 441.35 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1,549 million SLC 119.57 million SLC 1,429 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 1,731 million SLC 219.01 million SLC 1,512 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 1,033 million SLC 299.55 million SLC 733.55 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 1,481 million SLC 1,060 million SLC 420.71 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,850 million SLC 1,663 million SLC 186.7 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1,906 million SLC against 1,465 million SLC in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
441 million SLC, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 153rd and Jordan ranks 150th of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/china-hong-kong-sar/jordan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,919 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).