Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Equatorial Guinea
223,260 million SLC
in 2024
Iceland
165,809 million SLC
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
69th
Iceland rank
72nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 223,260 million SLC against 165,809 million SLC in Iceland, a difference of 57,451 million SLC.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 69th and Iceland ranks 72nd of 199 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 1,085 million SLC 313.05 million SLC 771.69 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
1980s 4,366 million SLC 12,604 million SLC 8,238 million SLC Iceland
1990s 11,675 million SLC 42,627 million SLC 30,953 million SLC Iceland
2000s 69,449 million SLC 61,681 million SLC 7,769 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2010s 137,388 million SLC 114,547 million SLC 22,840 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2020s 203,330 million SLC 155,051 million SLC 48,279 million SLC Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Equatorial Guinea or Iceland?
Equatorial Guinea, at 223,260 million SLC against 165,809 million SLC in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Equatorial Guinea and Iceland?
57,451 million SLC, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Iceland?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 69th and Iceland ranks 72nd of 199 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/equatorial-guinea/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/equatorial-guinea/iceland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,919 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).