Angola vs South-Eastern Asia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Angola
6.68 % change on previous year
in 2024
South-Eastern Asia
0.5491 % change on previous year
in 2024
Angola rank
23rd
South-Eastern Asia rank
23rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Angola
  • South-Eastern Asia
-40-20020197119972024

How they compare

Angola currently reports 6.68 % change on previous year against 0.5491 % change on previous year in South-Eastern Asia, a difference of 6.13 % change on previous year.

That makes Angola's figure about 12.2 times South-Eastern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 23rd and South-Eastern Asia ranks 23rd of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and South-Eastern Asia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola South-Eastern Asia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4294 % change on previous year 4.04 % change on previous year 3.61 % change on previous year South-Eastern Asia
1980s 0.8573 % change on previous year 3.55 % change on previous year 2.69 % change on previous year South-Eastern Asia
1990s -1.26 % change on previous year 2.39 % change on previous year 3.65 % change on previous year South-Eastern Asia
2000s 8.34 % change on previous year 3.71 % change on previous year 4.63 % change on previous year Angola
2010s 5.36 % change on previous year 2.65 % change on previous year 2.71 % change on previous year Angola
2020s 6.41 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year 4.89 % change on previous year Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Angola or South-Eastern Asia?
Angola, at 6.68 % change on previous year against 0.5491 % change on previous year in South-Eastern Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Angola and South-Eastern Asia?
6.13 % change on previous year, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and South-Eastern Asia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Angola and South-Eastern Asia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Angola ranks 23rd and South-Eastern Asia ranks 23rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs South-Eastern Asia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-annual-growth-rate/angola/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-annual-growth-rate/angola/south-eastern-asia/">Angola vs South-Eastern Asia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,520 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.