China, Hong Kong SAR vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

China, Hong Kong SAR
-9.28 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Sudan
-9.78 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
203rd
South Sudan rank
204th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • South Sudan
-50050100197119972024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -9.28 % change on previous year against -9.78 % change on previous year in South Sudan, a difference of 0.5 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was South Sudan ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 203rd and South Sudan ranks 204th of 218 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s -4.57 % change on previous year 45.58 % change on previous year 50.15 % change on previous year South Sudan
2010s -1.62 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year South Sudan
2020s -5.34 % change on previous year 4.53 % change on previous year 9.87 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, China, Hong Kong SAR or South Sudan?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -9.28 % change on previous year against -9.78 % change on previous year in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan?
0.5 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 203rd and South Sudan ranks 204th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/south-sudan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,520 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.