How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and San Marino?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Aruba

0 million USD per person

in 2024

San Marino

0 million USD per person

in 2024

Aruba rank

179th

San Marino rank

180th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Aruba
San Marino

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in San Marino, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.4 times San Marino's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was San Marino ahead.

Aruba ranks 179th and San Marino ranks 180th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	San Marino	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	San Marino
1980s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	San Marino
1990s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	San Marino
2000s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	San Marino
2010s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	San Marino
2020s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Aruba or San Marino?: Aruba, at 0 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in San Marino as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Aruba and San Marino?: 0 million USD per person, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and San Marino?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Aruba and San Marino rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Aruba ranks 179th and San Marino ranks 180th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/aruba/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/aruba/san-marino/">Aruba vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.