How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Samoa?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Samoa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Barbados

0.0003 million USD per person

in 2024

Samoa

0.0003 million USD per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

99th

Samoa rank

102nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Barbados
Samoa

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0003 million USD per person in Samoa, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Samoa ahead.

Barbados ranks 99th and Samoa ranks 102nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Samoa
1980s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Samoa
1990s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Samoa
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Samoa
2010s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Barbados
2020s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Barbados or Samoa?: Barbados, at 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0003 million USD per person in Samoa as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Barbados and Samoa?: 0 million USD per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Samoa?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Samoa rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Barbados ranks 99th and Samoa ranks 102nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Samoa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/barbados/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/barbados/samoa/">Barbados vs Samoa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.