British Virgin Islands vs Lesotho: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

British Virgin Islands
0 million USD per person
in 2024
Lesotho
0.0001 million USD per person
in 2024
British Virgin Islands rank
176th
Lesotho rank
173rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • Lesotho
000000197019972024

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0.0001 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per person.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 2.2 times British Virgin Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Lesotho ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 176th and Lesotho ranks 173rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, British Virgin Islands averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Lesotho
1980s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Lesotho
1990s 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person British Virgin Islands
2000s 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person 0 million USD per person British Virgin Islands
2010s 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person 0 million USD per person British Virgin Islands
2020s 0 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, British Virgin Islands or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 0.0001 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in British Virgin Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between British Virgin Islands and Lesotho?
0.0001 million USD per person, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Lesotho?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do British Virgin Islands and Lesotho rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
British Virgin Islands ranks 176th and Lesotho ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs Lesotho: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/british-virgin-islands/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/british-virgin-islands/lesotho/">British Virgin Islands vs Lesotho: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.