How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kenya?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Kenya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Eswatini

0.0003 million USD per person

in 2024

Kenya

0.0003 million USD per person

in 2024

Eswatini rank

111th

Kenya rank

110th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Eswatini
Kenya

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0003 million USD per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kenya ahead.

Eswatini ranks 111th and Kenya ranks 110th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Kenya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Kenya	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Kenya
1980s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Eswatini
1990s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Kenya
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Eswatini
2010s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Eswatini
2020s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Eswatini or Kenya?: Kenya, at 0.0003 million USD per person against 0.0003 million USD per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Eswatini and Kenya?: 0 million USD per person, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kenya?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Kenya rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Eswatini ranks 111th and Kenya ranks 110th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Kenya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/eswatini/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/eswatini/kenya/">Eswatini vs Kenya: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.