How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritius?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Guatemala

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Mauritius

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Guatemala rank

75th

Mauritius rank

72nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Guatemala
Mauritius

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 75th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 180 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Guatemala
1980s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Guatemala
1990s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Guatemala
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Guatemala
2010s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Guatemala
2020s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Guatemala or Mauritius?: Mauritius, at 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Guatemala and Mauritius?: 0 million USD per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritius?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Mauritius rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Guatemala ranks 75th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/guatemala/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/guatemala/mauritius/">Guatemala vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.