How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Senegal?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Guinea

0.0002 million USD per person

in 2024

Senegal

0.0002 million USD per person

in 2024

Guinea rank

133rd

Senegal rank

132nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Guinea
Senegal

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 0.0002 million USD per person against 0.0002 million USD per person in Guinea, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 133rd and Senegal ranks 132nd of 180 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea	Senegal	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Senegal
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Senegal
1990s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Senegal
2000s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Senegal
2010s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Senegal
2020s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Guinea or Senegal?: Senegal, at 0.0002 million USD per person against 0.0002 million USD per person in Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Guinea and Senegal?: 0 million USD per person, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Senegal?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guinea and Senegal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Guinea ranks 133rd and Senegal ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/guinea/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/guinea/senegal/">Guinea vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.