How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and World?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs World: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Iceland

0.0029 million USD per person

in 2024

World

0.0005 million USD per person

in 2024

Iceland rank

2nd

World rank

1st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Iceland
World

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0029 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in World, a difference of 0.0024 million USD per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 5.8 times World's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	World	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0032 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0029 million USD per person	Iceland
1980s	0.0039 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0036 million USD per person	Iceland
1990s	0.0037 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0034 million USD per person	Iceland
2000s	0.0031 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0028 million USD per person	Iceland
2010s	0.0028 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0023 million USD per person	Iceland
2020s	0.0029 million USD per person	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0025 million USD per person	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Iceland or World?: Iceland, at 0.0029 million USD per person against 0.0005 million USD per person in World as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Iceland and World?: 0.0024 million USD per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and World?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Iceland and World rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Iceland ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs World: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/iceland/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/iceland/world/">Iceland vs World: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.