How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Malawi

0.0001 million USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0001 million USD per person

in 2024

Malawi rank

164th

Zimbabwe rank

161st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Malawi
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 million USD per person against 0.0001 million USD per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Malawi ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Malawi
2020s	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Malawi or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 million USD per person against 0.0001 million USD per person in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Malawi and Zimbabwe?: 0 million USD per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Malawi ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 161st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.