How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritius?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Malta

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Mauritius

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Malta rank

70th

Mauritius rank

72nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Malta
Mauritius

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Malta ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Mauritius
1980s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Mauritius
1990s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Mauritius
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Malta
2010s	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Mauritius
2020s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Malta or Mauritius?: Malta, at 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Malta and Mauritius?: 0 million USD per person, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritius?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malta and Mauritius rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Malta ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/malta/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/malta/mauritius/">Malta vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.