How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Portugal?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mongolia vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Mongolia

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Portugal

0.0004 million USD per person

in 2024

Mongolia rank

77th

Portugal rank

76th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Mongolia
Portugal

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Mongolia, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Portugal ahead.

Mongolia ranks 77th and Portugal ranks 76th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 4 and Portugal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mongolia	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Mongolia
1980s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Mongolia
1990s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	Portugal
2000s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Portugal
2010s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Mongolia
2020s	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Mongolia or Portugal?: Portugal, at 0.0004 million USD per person against 0.0004 million USD per person in Mongolia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Mongolia and Portugal?: 0 million USD per person, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Portugal?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and Portugal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Mongolia ranks 77th and Portugal ranks 76th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/mongolia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/mongolia/portugal/">Mongolia vs Portugal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.