Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0001 million USD per person
in 2024
Zambia
0 million USD per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
172nd
Zambia rank
175th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zambia
00000197019972024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0001 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per person.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.6 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd and Zambia ranks 175th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Zambia
1980s 0.0002 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0003 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0003 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0002 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0001 million USD per person 0.0001 million USD per person 0 million USD per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zambia?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0001 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia?
0.0001 million USD per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd and Zambia ranks 175th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/turks-and-caicos-islands/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-capita/turks-and-caicos-islands/zambia/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per capita
Unit
million USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.