Angola vs Brazil: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Angola
0.0109 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.0123 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
134th
Brazil rank
132nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Angola
  • Brazil
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 134th and Brazil ranks 132nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Brazil Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Angola
1980s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Angola
1990s 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre 0.0066 million USD per square kilometre 0.0028 million USD per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.011 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Angola or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Angola and Brazil?
0.0014 million USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Brazil?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and Brazil rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Angola ranks 134th and Brazil ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Brazil: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/angola/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/angola/brazil/">Angola vs Brazil: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.