Angola vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Angola
0.0109 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0115 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
134th
Iceland rank
133rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Angola
  • Iceland
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 134th and Iceland ranks 133rd of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre 0.0099 million USD per square kilometre 0.0077 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Angola or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Angola and Iceland?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Angola and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Angola ranks 134th and Iceland ranks 133rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/angola/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/angola/iceland/">Angola vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.