Argentina vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Argentina
0.0088 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
0.0082 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
141st
Bhutan rank
143rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Argentina
  • Bhutan
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 0.0088 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 141st and Bhutan ranks 143rd of 180 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Bhutan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0037 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre 0.0044 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.0096 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0042 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 0.0113 million USD per square kilometre 0.0068 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.0108 million USD per square kilometre 0.0081 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Argentina or Bhutan?
Argentina, at 0.0088 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Argentina and Bhutan?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bhutan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Bhutan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Argentina ranks 141st and Bhutan ranks 143rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/argentina/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/argentina/bhutan/">Argentina vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.