Aruba vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Aruba
0.0045 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.0039 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
162nd
Kazakhstan rank
164th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Aruba
  • Kazakhstan
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005197019962023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Aruba ranks 162nd and Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 180 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Aruba or Kazakhstan?
Aruba, at 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Aruba and Kazakhstan?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Kazakhstan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Aruba ranks 162nd and Kazakhstan ranks 164th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/aruba/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/aruba/kazakhstan/">Aruba vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.