Australia vs Niger: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Australia
0.0054 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
0.0049 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
158th
Niger rank
160th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Australia
  • Niger
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.005197019962023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre in Niger, a difference of 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 158th and Niger ranks 160th of 180 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Niger Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0042 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Australia or Niger?
Australia, at 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Australia and Niger?
0.0005 million USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Niger?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Australia and Niger rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Australia ranks 158th and Niger ranks 160th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Niger: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/australia/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/australia/niger/">Australia vs Niger: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.