Bahamas vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Bahamas
0.0065 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0065 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
152nd
Mozambique rank
153rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Bahamas
  • Mozambique
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 152nd and Mozambique ranks 153rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 5 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0105 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0132 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre 0.0114 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0141 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0061 million USD per square kilometre 0.0061 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Bahamas or Mozambique?
Bahamas, at 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Bahamas and Mozambique?
0 million USD per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mozambique?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Mozambique rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Bahamas ranks 152nd and Mozambique ranks 153rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/mozambique/">Bahamas vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.