Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Bahamas
0.0065 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0066 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
152nd
Zimbabwe rank
151st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0066 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 180 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0105 million USD per square kilometre 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0132 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre 0.0087 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0141 million USD per square kilometre 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre 0.01 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.0042 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0061 million USD per square kilometre 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0066 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Bahamas ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 151st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.