Barbados vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Barbados
0.2239 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.1597 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
9th
Singapore rank
12th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Barbados
  • Singapore
0.10.20.30.40.5197019962023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.2239 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1597 million USD per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0642 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.4 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Singapore ahead.

Barbados ranks 9th and Singapore ranks 12th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2594 million USD per square kilometre 0.3858 million USD per square kilometre 0.1265 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.2489 million USD per square kilometre 0.3987 million USD per square kilometre 0.1499 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.203 million USD per square kilometre 0.2185 million USD per square kilometre 0.0155 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.1868 million USD per square kilometre 0.1302 million USD per square kilometre 0.0566 million USD per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.2508 million USD per square kilometre 0.14 million USD per square kilometre 0.1108 million USD per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.257 million USD per square kilometre 0.1588 million USD per square kilometre 0.0982 million USD per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Barbados or Singapore?
Barbados, at 0.2239 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1597 million USD per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Barbados and Singapore?
0.0642 million USD per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Singapore?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Singapore rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Barbados ranks 9th and Singapore ranks 12th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/barbados/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/barbados/singapore/">Barbados vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.