Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Belarus
0.0193 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0201 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
113th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
111th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
00.0050.010.0150.020.025199220072023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0201 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 113th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th of 180 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre 0.0158 million USD per square kilometre 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 0.0126 million USD per square kilometre 0.0186 million USD per square kilometre 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0178 million USD per square kilometre 0.0198 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0194 million USD per square kilometre 0.0206 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0201 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.0008 million USD per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Belarus ranks 113th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.