How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Colombia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Belarus

0.0193 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Colombia

0.0193 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

113th

Colombia rank

114th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Belarus
Colombia

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 113th and Colombia ranks 114th of 180 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Colombia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0109 million USD per square kilometre	0.0103 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.0126 million USD per square kilometre	0.0122 million USD per square kilometre	0.0004 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.0178 million USD per square kilometre	0.0155 million USD per square kilometre	0.0024 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.0194 million USD per square kilometre	0.0189 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Belarus or Colombia?: Belarus, at 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Belarus and Colombia?: 0 million USD per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Belarus ranks 113th and Colombia ranks 114th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Colombia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/belarus/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/belarus/colombia/">Belarus vs Colombia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.