Belarus vs Georgia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Belarus
0.0193 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
0.02 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
113th
Georgia rank
112th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Belarus
  • Georgia
0.010.020.030.04199220072023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.02 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Belarus ranks 113th and Georgia ranks 112th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0109 million USD per square kilometre 0.0244 million USD per square kilometre 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0126 million USD per square kilometre 0.0175 million USD per square kilometre 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0178 million USD per square kilometre 0.0177 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0194 million USD per square kilometre 0.0205 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Belarus or Georgia?
Georgia, at 0.02 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Belarus and Georgia?
0.0007 million USD per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Belarus ranks 113th and Georgia ranks 112th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Georgia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/belarus/georgia/">Belarus vs Georgia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.