Bermuda vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Bermuda
0.3025 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.7628 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
5th
Malta rank
2nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Bermuda
  • Malta
0.20.40.60.8197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.7628 million USD per square kilometre against 0.3025 million USD per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 0.4603 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 2.5 times Bermuda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bermuda ahead.

Bermuda ranks 5th and Malta ranks 2nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 5 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3501 million USD per square kilometre 0.1695 million USD per square kilometre 0.1806 million USD per square kilometre Bermuda
1980s 0.4381 million USD per square kilometre 0.2275 million USD per square kilometre 0.2106 million USD per square kilometre Bermuda
1990s 0.5025 million USD per square kilometre 0.2599 million USD per square kilometre 0.2427 million USD per square kilometre Bermuda
2000s 0.7149 million USD per square kilometre 0.3872 million USD per square kilometre 0.3277 million USD per square kilometre Bermuda
2010s 0.3646 million USD per square kilometre 0.3085 million USD per square kilometre 0.0561 million USD per square kilometre Bermuda
2020s 0.3468 million USD per square kilometre 0.4828 million USD per square kilometre 0.136 million USD per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Bermuda or Malta?
Malta, at 0.7628 million USD per square kilometre against 0.3025 million USD per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Bermuda and Malta?
0.4603 million USD per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Malta rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Bermuda ranks 5th and Malta ranks 2nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/malta/">Bermuda vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.