Bhutan vs Paraguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Bhutan
0.0082 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
0.0086 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
143rd
Paraguay rank
142nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Bhutan
  • Paraguay
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 0.0086 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 143rd and Paraguay ranks 142nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Paraguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Paraguay Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.0044 million USD per square kilometre 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre 0.001 million USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0047 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.0068 million USD per square kilometre 0.0084 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 0.0081 million USD per square kilometre 0.0087 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Bhutan or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 0.0086 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Bhutan and Paraguay?
0.0004 million USD per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Paraguay?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Paraguay rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Bhutan ranks 143rd and Paraguay ranks 142nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Paraguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/paraguay/">Bhutan vs Paraguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.