Brazil vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Brazil
0.0123 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0115 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
132nd
Iceland rank
133rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Brazil
  • Iceland
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Brazil ranks 132nd and Iceland ranks 133rd of 180 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre 0.0047 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.006 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0099 million USD per square kilometre 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0066 million USD per square kilometre 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.011 million USD per square kilometre 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Brazil or Iceland?
Brazil, at 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Brazil and Iceland?
0.0008 million USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Brazil ranks 132nd and Iceland ranks 133rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/brazil/iceland/">Brazil vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.