Cambodia vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Cambodia
0.0296 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.0281 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
88th
Malawi rank
90th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Cambodia
  • Malawi
0.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03197019962023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.0296 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0281 million USD per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 88th and Malawi ranks 90th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0088 million USD per square kilometre 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre Cambodia
1980s 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 0.0125 million USD per square kilometre 0.0098 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Cambodia
2000s 0.0187 million USD per square kilometre 0.0138 million USD per square kilometre 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 0.0275 million USD per square kilometre 0.021 million USD per square kilometre 0.0064 million USD per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 0.0293 million USD per square kilometre 0.0272 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Cambodia or Malawi?
Cambodia, at 0.0296 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0281 million USD per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Cambodia and Malawi?
0.0015 million USD per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Malawi?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Malawi rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Cambodia ranks 88th and Malawi ranks 90th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/malawi/">Cambodia vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.