Canada vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Canada
0.0034 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
0.0033 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
166th
San Marino rank
167th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Canada
  • San Marino
0.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was San Marino ahead.

Canada ranks 166th and San Marino ranks 167th of 180 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada San Marino Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
1980s 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre 0.0052 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
1990s 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0064 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Canada or San Marino?
Canada, at 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Canada and San Marino?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and San Marino?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Canada and San Marino rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Canada ranks 166th and San Marino ranks 167th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/canada/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/canada/san-marino/">Canada vs San Marino: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.