How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Chile

0.0134 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

0.0144 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

127th

Sudan rank

124th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Chile
Sudan

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.0144 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.001 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 127th and Sudan ranks 124th of 180 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0125 million USD per square kilometre	0.0145 million USD per square kilometre	0.002 million USD per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	0.0133 million USD per square kilometre	0.0152 million USD per square kilometre	0.0019 million USD per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Chile or Sudan?: Sudan, at 0.0144 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Chile and Sudan?: 0.001 million USD per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Chile ranks 127th and Sudan ranks 124th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/chile/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/chile/sudan/">Chile vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.