Chile vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Chile
0.0134 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0135 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
127th
Turkmenistan rank
126th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Chile
  • Turkmenistan
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 127th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 180 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0122 million USD per square kilometre 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0133 million USD per square kilometre 0.0124 million USD per square kilometre 0.001 million USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Chile or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Chile and Turkmenistan?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and Turkmenistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Chile ranks 127th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/chile/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/chile/turkmenistan/">Chile vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.