Colombia vs Norway: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Colombia
0.0193 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.0173 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
114th
Norway rank
117th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Colombia
  • Norway
0.0050.010.0150.02197019962023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.002 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

Colombia ranks 114th and Norway ranks 117th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 4 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0057 million USD per square kilometre 0.0068 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0079 million USD per square kilometre 0.0074 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.0095 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 0.0122 million USD per square kilometre 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 0.0155 million USD per square kilometre 0.0156 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.0189 million USD per square kilometre 0.0175 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Colombia or Norway?
Colombia, at 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Colombia and Norway?
0.002 million USD per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Norway rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Colombia ranks 114th and Norway ranks 117th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Norway: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/colombia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/colombia/norway/">Colombia vs Norway: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.