Cyprus vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Cyprus
0.0351 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0334 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
80th
New Zealand rank
82nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Cyprus
  • New Zealand
0.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.0351 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0334 million USD per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 180 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0492 million USD per square kilometre 0.0131 million USD per square kilometre 0.0361 million USD per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 0.0493 million USD per square kilometre 0.0163 million USD per square kilometre 0.033 million USD per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 0.0606 million USD per square kilometre 0.0222 million USD per square kilometre 0.0385 million USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 0.0613 million USD per square kilometre 0.0263 million USD per square kilometre 0.035 million USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 0.0451 million USD per square kilometre 0.0289 million USD per square kilometre 0.0162 million USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 0.0391 million USD per square kilometre 0.0315 million USD per square kilometre 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Cyprus or New Zealand?
Cyprus, at 0.0351 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0334 million USD per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Cyprus and New Zealand?
0.0017 million USD per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Cyprus ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/new-zealand/">Cyprus vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.